Leisure Time – On Everyday and Uncommon Scenarios of Experiencing Leisure
1
Zakład Socjologii Jednostki i Relacji Społecznych, Wydział Socjologii UAM, Polska
Submission date: 2023-04-11
Final revision date: 2023-05-31
Acceptance date: 2023-05-31
Publication date: 2023-06-30
Corresponding author
Dorota Irena Mroczkowska
Zakład Socjologii Jednostki i Relacji Społecznych, Wydział Socjologii UAM, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89c, 60-568 Poznań, Poznań, Polska
Zakład Socjologii Jednostki i Relacji Społecznych, Wydział Socjologii UAM, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89c, 60-568 Poznań, Poznań, Polska
Studia Humanistyczne AGH 2023;(1):13-32
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The presentation of leisure time as time spent away from work does not fully reflect contemporary reality, in which working time and leisure are blurring due to factors such as flexible working hours or mobile technologies. Furthermore, individuals who engage in two or more activities at the same time (multitasking) or those indicating the multidimensional nature of leisure are becoming more common. As a result, traditional quantitative methodologies based on the work-leisure dichotomy are unsuitable for studying leisure. Based on interpretative methodology and research method triangulation, the text presents an experiential perspective on the approach to leisure. This approach results in a way of thinking about leisure that rejects the traditional work-leisure dichotomy in favour of subjective experience, resulting in a variety of forms, styles, and ways of experiencing leisure time in a changing social context.
REFERENCES (75)
1.
Ahmed, S. (2000). Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-coloniality. London: Routledge.
2.
Angrosino, M. (2010). Badania etnograficzne i obserwacyjne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
3.
Babbie, E. (2003). Badania społeczne w praktyce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
4.
Beck, U., Giddens, A., Lash S. (ed.). (2009). Modernizacja refleksyjna. Polityka, tradycja i estetyka w porządku społecznym nowoczesności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
5.
Berger, P., Luckman, T. (1983). Społeczne tworzenie rzeczywistości. Warszawa: PIW.
6.
Best, S. (2010). Leisure Studies. Themes & Persectives. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
8.
Bloch, P.H., Bruce, D.G. (1984). Product Involvement as Leisure Behavior. W: T. C. Kinnear (ed.), Advances in Consumer Research (s. 197–202). UT: Association for Consumer Research.
9.
Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Campbell, C. (2006). Konsumuję, więc wiem, że jestem. Kultura Popularna, 4, 546–560.
11.
Certeau, M., de. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. London: University of California Press.
12.
Charmaz, K. (2009). Teoria ugruntowana. Praktyczny przewodnik po analizie jakościowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
13.
Clark, J., Critcher, C. (1985). The devil makes work: leisure in capitalist Britain. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
14.
Cohen, S., Tylor, L. (1992). Escape attempts: the theory and practice of resistance to everyday life. London: Routledge.
15.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal Experience in Work and Leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815–822.
17.
Daly, K.J. (2007). Qualitative Methods for Family Studies & Human Development. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage Publications.
18.
Dattilo, J., Murphy, M. (1991). Leisure education program planning: A systematic approach. State College, PA: Venture Publishing Company.
19.
Dattilo, J., Kleiber, D.A. (1993). Psychological Perspectives for Therapeutic Recreation Research: The Psychology of Enjoyment. W: M.J. Malkin, C.Z. Howe (ed.), Research in Therapeutic Recreation: Concepts and methods (s. 57–76). State College, PA: Venture.
20.
Denzin, N.K. (2009). The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research, 9, 139–160.
21.
Dumazedier, J. (1971). Leisure and Post-Industrial Societies. W: M. Kaplan, P. Bosserman (ed.), Technology, Human Values, and Leisure (s. 191–220). Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
22.
Drozdowski, R., Krajewski, M. (2007). Wyobraźnia socjologiczna. Horyzonty, źródła, dynamika. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
23.
Drozdowski, R. (2009). Obraza na obrazy. Strategie społecznego oporu wobec obrazów dominujących. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
24.
Glaser, B., Strauss, A.L. (2009). Odkrywanie teorii ugruntowanej. Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy Nomos.
25.
Guba, E.G., Lincoln Y.S. (2009). Kontrowersje wokół paradygmatów, sprzeczności i wyłaniające się zbieżności. W: N.K. Denzin, I.S. Lincoln (ed.), Metody badań jakościowych, t. 1. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
26.
Godbey, G. (2008). Leisure in your life. New Perpsective. Pennsylvania: Venture Publishing, Inc.
27.
Gouldner, A. (1971). The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. London, New Delhi: Heineman.
28.
Hamilton-Smith, E. (1991). The construction of leisure. W: B. Driver, P. Brown, G. Peterson (ed.), Benefits of leisure. State College, PA: Venture.
29.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.
30.
Henderson, K.A., Bialeschki, D., Shaw, S.M., Freysinger V.J. (1989). A Leisure of One’s Own: A Feminist Perspective on Women’s Leisure. Pennsylvania: Venture Publishing.
31.
Henderson, K.A. (1991). Dimensions of Choice: A Qualitative Approach to Recreation, Parks, and Leisure Research. State College: Venture Publishing Inc.
32.
Henderson, K.A. (1994). Perspectives on analysing gender, women and leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 1–7.
33.
Hemingway, J.L. (1995). Leisure studies and interpretive inquiry. Leisure Studies, 14, 32–47.
34.
Hemingway, J.L. (1996). Emancipating Leisure: The recovery of freedom in leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 28, 27–43.
35.
Hemingway, J.L. (1999). Leisure, social capital, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 150–165.
36.
Holstein, J.A., Gubrium, J.F. (1995). The active interview. Sage Publications, Inc.
37.
Howe, Ch.Z. (1991). Considerations When Using Phenomenology in Leisure Inquiry: Beliefs, Methods, and Analysis in Naturalistic Research. Leisure Studies, 10, 49–62.
38.
Hultsman, J.T., Anderson S.C. (1991). Studying leisure perceptions: A need for methodological expansion. Leisure Studies, 10, 63–67.
41.
Kelly, J.R. (1987). Freedom to Be: A New Sociology of Leisure. London, New York: Macmillan.
42.
Kelly, J.R., Godbey, G. (1992). Sociology of leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
44.
Kelly, J.R. (1999). Leisure and Society: A Dialectical Analysis. W: E.L. Jackson, T.L. Burton (ed.), Leisure Studies: Prospects for the Twenty-First Century. State College, PA: Venture.
45.
Kleinman, S., Cropp, M.A. (1993). Emotions and Fieldwork. Thousan Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
46.
Konecki, K. (2000). Studia z metodologii badań jakościowych. Teoria ugruntowana. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
47.
Krajewski, M. (2009). Koniec lat 80. Rewolucja wyobraźni. W: M. Forecki (red.). I love Poland. Poznań: ZPF.
48.
Krieger, S. (1991). Social Science and the Self: Personal Essays on an Art Form. New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press.
51.
Lyng, S. (1990). Edgework: A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Tasking. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 887–921.
52.
Mannell, R.C. (1999). Leisure Experience and Satisfaction. W: E.L. Jackson, T.L. Burton (ed.). Leisure Studies: Prospects For The Twenty-First Century. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
53.
Manterys, A. (1997). Wielość rzeczywistości w teoriach socjologicznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
54.
Mroczkowska, D., Rogowski, Ł., Skrobacki, R. (2009). Codzienność niecodzienna/niecodzienność codzienna – spojrzenie na dylematy socjologii życia codziennego. W: S. Rudnicki, J. Stypińska, J. Wojnicka (red.), Społeczeństwo i codzienność. W stronę nowej socjologii? (s. 93–104). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo WAiP.
55.
Mroczkowska, D. (red.). (2011). Czas wolny: refleksje, dylematy, perspektywy. Warszawa: Difin.
56.
Mroczkowska, D. (2012). Wymarzone style życia. O pragnieniach, marzeniach, aspiracjach Polaków odnośnie wypoczynku i czasu wolnego. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 4, 165–176.
57.
Mroczkowska, D. (2020). Zrozumieć czas wolny. Przeobrażenia, tożsamość, doświadczanie. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
58.
Pavelka, J. (2000). It’s Not About Time. Rediscovering Leisure in a Changing World. Kanada: Creative Bound Inc.
59.
Parr, M.G., Lashua, B.D. (2004). What Is Leisure? The Perceptions of Recreation Practioners and Others. Leisure Sciences, 26, 1–17.
60.
Pedlar, A. (1995). Relevance and Action Research in Leisure. Leisure Sciences, 17, 133–140.
61.
Rembowski, J. (1986). Metoda projekcyjna w psychologii dzieci i młodzieży. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
63.
Rojek, C. (1995). Decentring Leisure. Rethinking Leisure Theory. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
64.
Rojek, C. (2005). Leisure theory. Principles and practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
65.
Rojek, C., Shaw, S., Veal, A.J. (ed.) (2006). A handbook of leisure studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
66.
Rokuszewska-Pawełek, A. (2006). Wywiad narracyjny jako źródło informacji. Media, Kultura, Społeczeństwo, 1, 17–28.
67.
Shaw, S.M. (1985). The Meaning of Leisure in Everyday Life. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 1–24.
68.
Shaw, R. (2006). Critical Issues of Community Based Flood Mitigation: Examples from Bangladesh and Vietnam. Journal of Science & Culture, 72, 1–17.
69.
Stebbins, R.A. (2007). Serious Leisure. A Perspective for Our Time. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publisher.
70.
Schütz, A. (1984). Potoczna i naukowa interpretacja ludzkiego działania. W: E. Mokrzycki (red.). Kryzys i schizma. Antyscjentystyczne kierunki w socjologii współczesnej. Warszawa: PIW.
71.
Silvermann, D. (2008). Prowadzenie badań jakościowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
72.
Tinsley, H.A., Tinsley, D.J. (1986). A Theory of the Attributes, Benefits, and Causes of Leisure Experience. Leisure Sciences, 8, 1–46.
73.
Valtonen, A. (2004). Rethinking Free Time. A Study on Boundaries, Disorders, and Symbolic Goods. Helsinki: School of Economics.
74.
Watkins, M. (2000). Ways of Learning about Leisure Meanings. Leisure Sciences, 22, 9, 3–100.
75.
Weissinger, E., Henderson, K.A., Bowling, Ch.P. (2013). Toward an Expanding Methodological Base in Leisure Studies: Researchers’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Concerning Qualitative Research. Loisir et Societe, 20, 435–451.
| eISSN: | 2300-7109 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
