PL EN
The Socratic Practice Of “Care of the Self” (Epimeleia Heautou) and the Coaching Process
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Polska
 
 
Submission date: 2023-02-27
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-05-23
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-05-23
 
 
Publication date: 2023-12-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Justyna Kroczak   

Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Polska
 
 
Studia Humanistyczne AGH 2023;(2):101-109
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In this paper I present a comparative analysis of the knowledge discovery process applied by Socrates and the contemporary life coach. On one hand, I will use the method of in-depth analysis of selected (Socratic) dialogues by Plato, and on the other one of coaching practice and coaching values formulated by the International Coach Federation. The term “care of the self” (epimeleia heautou) appears in the Socratic dialogues, Alkibiades I and Apology of Socrates, and this term is juxtaposed with the coaching idea of “being resourceful”. “Taking care of yourself” is about constantly gaining knowledge about yourself. This knowledge is extracted by Socrates and, in contemporary terms, by a life coach. The process of uncovering knowledge involves certain key elements that are shared by both the Socratic method and modern life coaching: establishing a relationship, a purpose and relevant questions. The analysis of each of these elements leads us to the conclusion that the key value of coaching, “the resourceful state of the coach and the coachee”, has its roots in ancient philosophy – in the wisdom of Socrates.
 
REFERENCES (13)
1.
Atkinson, M.W., Chois, R.T. (2007). The Art and Science of Coaching: The Inner Dynamics of Transformational Conversations. Dallas: Exalon Publishing.
 
2.
Bennett, J., Bush, M.W. (2009). Coaching in organizations. Current trends and future opportunities. OD Practitioner, 41(1), 2–7.
 
3.
Cox, E. (2013). Coaching understood: a pragmatic inquiry into the coaching process. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 8(1), 265–270.
 
4.
Foucault, M. (2005). Hermeneutics of the Subject. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981–82.
 
5.
F. Gros, F. Ewald (Eds.), A. Fontana, G. Burchell (Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
 
6.
Gyllensten, K., Palmer, S. (2007). The coaching relationship: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2, 2, 169–177.
 
7.
Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a Way of Life. Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, trans. A.I. Davidson, M. Chase. Oxford: Blackwells.
 
8.
International Coaching Federation 1. ICF Code of Ethics. Retrieved from: https://coachingfederation.org... [23.11.2022].
 
9.
International Coaching Federation 2. ICF Core Competencies. https://coachingfederation.org... [23.11.2022].
 
10.
Neale, S., Spencer-Arnell, L., Wilson, L. (2011). Emotional Intelligence Coaching. Improving Performance for Leaders, Coaches and the Individual. London: Kogan Page.
 
11.
Plato. (1921–1969). Plato in Twelve Volumes. H.N. Fowler (Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
 
12.
Rogers, C.R. (1995). On Becoming a Person: a Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
 
13.
Rogers, J. (2016). Coaching Skills: The Definitive Guide to Being a Coach. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
 
eISSN:2300-7109
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top