How to Develop Connective Digital Platform for Urban Activism in Unfree Country: Case of “Robim Good” Project
More details
Hide details
Department of Political Science, Masaryk University, Czech Republic
Submission date: 2022-11-10
Acceptance date: 2022-12-10
Publication date: 2022-12-30
Corresponding author
Andrei Kalavur   

Department of Political Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
Studia Humanistyczne AGH 2022;21(4):51-59
This article aims to analyze the “Robim Good” project – a digital platform for sharing urban knowledge and info about upcoming local campaigns. A vacuum among urban initiatives was established in Belarus because of the repressive policy of the authoritarian regime. As a result, around 965 non-profit organizations have been shut down. Nonetheless, there was a demand from activists to create a safe managerial organization that focused on urbanism. The “Robim Good” project became a solution. The research question is as follows: what is the value orientation of the analyzed digital platform that attracts new participants? The paper applies the value-based approach in NGO engagement. The analysis shows that one of the main promoted values and key characteristics of the digital ecosystem is security, which is directed at overcoming the dangers of the unpredictable regime. Subsequently, “Robim Good” has been able to engage volunteers and survive after a year of activity.
Afzalan, N., Muller, B. (2018). Online participatory technologies: Opportunities and challenges for enriching participatory planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 84(2), 162–177.
Auseyushkin, Y. (2021). Telegram in Belarus: More than a messenger. Retrieved from: ISANS, [1.08.2022].
Barns, S. (2019). Negotiating the platform pivot: From participatory digital ecosystems to infrastructures of everyday life. Geography Compass Journal, 13, 1–13.
Belsat. (2021). Makey: “Uzhestocheniye sanktsiy privedet k tomu, chto grazhdanskoye obshchestvo perestanet sushchestvovat’” [Макей: «Ужесточение санкций приведет к тому, что гражданское общество перестанет существовать»]. Retrieved from: Belsat, https:// [8.08.2022].
Chung, V., Dietz, M., Rab, I., Townsend, Z. (2020). Ecosystem 2.0: Climbing to the next level. Retrieved from: McKinsey Digital: McKinsey Quarterly, com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/ecosystem-2-point-0-climbing-to-the-nextlevel [15.09.2022].
van Dijk, J. (2013). Digital democracy: Vision and reality. Innovation and the Public Sector, 19, 49–62.
van Dijk, J., van Deursen, A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526.
Greijdanus, H., de Matos Fernandes, C.A., Turner-Zwinkels, F., Honari, A., Roos, C.A., Rosenbusch, H., Postmes, T. (2020). The psychology of online activism and social movements: Relations between online and offline collective action. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 49–54.
Lawtrend. (2022). Situatsiya so svobodoy assotsiatsiy i organizatsiyami grazhdanskogo obshchestva Respubliki Belarus’: obzor za avgust 2022 g. [Ситуация со свободой ассоциаций и организациями гражданского общества Республики Беларусь: обзор за август 2022 г.]. Retrieved from: Lawtrend, [4.09.2022].
Martin, R. (1999). NGO field security. Forced Migration Review, 4, 4–7.
Mercea, D. (2012). Digital prefigurative participation: The entwinement of online communication and offline participation in protest events. New Media & Society, 14(1), 153–169.
Nevedomskaya, T. (2021). “Unichtozheniye elity”: v Belarusi nachalsya razgrom NKO [“Уничтожение элиты”: в Беларуси начался разгром НКО]. Retrieved from: Deutsche Welle, a-58275073 [4.08.2022].
Plantin, J.-K., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P., Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310.
Saura, J., Palos-Sanchez, P., Velicia-Martin, F. (2020). What drives volunteers to accept a digital platform that supports NGO projects? Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–14.
Schedler, A. (2013). The politics of uncertainty: Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. Oxford University Press.
ZOiS Report. (2021). Belarus at a crossroads: Attitudes on social and political change. Retrieved from: ZOiS, [2.06.2021].
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top