Społeczno-ekonomiczna zależność od państwa a zachowania wyborcze w Rosji
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Uniwersytet Warszawski, Ośrodek Badań nad Migracjami
 
 
Data nadesłania: 30-09-2019
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 14-01-2020
 
 
Data akceptacji: 14-02-2020
 
 
Data publikacji: 30-03-2020
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Zuzanna Brunarska   

zuzanna.brunarska@uw.edu.pl
 
 
Studia Humanistyczne AGH 2020;19(1):105-124
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Artykuł odpowiada na pytanie, czy społeczno-ekonomiczna zależność jednostki od państwa w Rosji przekłada się na większą skłonność do udziału w wyborach i do głosowania na partię rządzącą lub jej kandydata. Na przykładzie dwóch regionów – obwodu jarosławskiego i Republiki Tatarstan – opisuje także mechanizmy wykorzystywane przez państwo do mobilizowania zależnych wyborców. Analiza ilościowa bazująca na danych pochodzących z sondażu Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey of the Higher School of Economics wskazuje na istnienie pozytywnego związku między społeczno-ekonomiczną zależnością od państwa a partycypacją wyborczą w odniesieniu do sektora i formalnego statusu zatrudnienia, statusu emerytalnego oraz zamieszkiwania na obszarach wiejskich. Jednocześnie wyniki nie dostarczają wystarczających dowodów na poparcie tezy, że zależność od państwa w tych sferach przekłada się na większą skłonność do oddania głosu na elity rządzące (zamieszkiwanie na obszarach wiejskich stanowi wyjątek).
 
REFERENCJE (50)
1.
Aldrich, John H. 1993. Rational Choice and Turnout, “American Journal of Political Science”, 37(1): 246–278.
 
2.
Alexandrova, Anastassia and Raymond Struyk. 2007. Reform of In-Kind Benefits in Russia: High Cost for a Small Gain, “Journal of European Social Policy”, 17(2): 153–166.
 
3.
Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2010. Social Contracts and Authoritarian Projects in Post-Soviet Space: The Use of Administrative Resource, “Communist and Post-Communist Studies”, 43: 373–382.
 
4.
Atkeson, Lonna R. 1999. ‘Sure, I Voted for the Winner!’ Overreport of the Primary Vote for the Party Nominee in the National Election Studies, “Political Behavior”, 21(3): 197–215.
 
5.
Balabanova, Evgeniya S. 2006. Ekonomicheskie osnovaniya sotsial’noy vlasti: teoreticheskaya model’ sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoy zavisimosti [Economic grounds for social power: theoretical model of socio-economic dependence], “Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya”, 1: 54–64.
 
6.
Brunarska, Zuzanna. 2015. Economic Disengagement in State–Society Relations in Russia – Analysis of a Household Survey, “Eurasian Geography and Economics”, 56(5): 547–574.
 
7.
Brunarska, Zuzanna. 2018. Understanding Sociopolitical Engagement of Society in Russia, “Problems of Post-Communism”, 65(5): 315–326.
 
8.
Buckley, Noah and Ora J. Reuter. 2015. Performance Incentives under Autocracy: Evidence from Russia’s Regions, Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/pa....
 
9.
Crowley, Stephen. 2016. Monotowns and the Political Economy of Industrial Restructuring in Russia, “Post-Soviet Affairs”, 32(5): 397–422.
 
10.
Forrat, Natalia. 2018. Shock-resistant Authoritarianism: Schoolteachers and Infrastructural State Capacity in Putin’s Russia, “Comparative Politics”, 50(3): 417–449.
 
11.
Frye, Timothy, Scott Gehlbach, Kyle L. Marquard and Ora J. Reuter. 2017. Is Putin’s popularity real?, “Post-Soviet Affairs”, 33(1): 1–15.
 
12.
Frye, Timothy, Ora J. Reuter and David Szakonyi. 2014. Political Machines at Work: Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace, “World Politics”, 66(2): 195–228.
 
13.
Frye, Timothy, Ora J. Reuter and David Szakonyi. 2018. Hitting Them with Carrots: Voter Intimidation and Vote buying in Russia, “British Journal of Political Science”, 49(3): 857–881.
 
14.
Frye, Timothy, Ora J. Reuter and David Szakonyi. 2019. Vote Brokers, Clientelist Appeals, and Voter Turnout: Evidence from Russia and Venezuela, “World Politics”, 71(4): 710–746.
 
15.
Gilev, Aleksey. 2017. Politicheskie mashiny i politicheskiy klientelizm v rossiyskikh regionakh [Political machines and political clientelism in Russian regions], “Politicheskaya nauka”, 4: 61–84.
 
16.
Goodnow, Regina, Robert G. Moser and Tony Smith. 2014. Ethnicity and Electoral Manipulation in Russia, “Electoral Studies”, 36: 15–27.
 
17.
Greene, Kenneth F. 2010. The Political Economy of Authoritarian Single-Party Dominance, “Comparative Political Studies”, 43(7): 807–834.
 
18.
Haaparanta, Pertti, Tuuli Juurikkala, Olga Lazareva, Jukka Pirttilä, Laura Solanko and Ekaterina Zhuravskaya. 2003. Firms and Public Service Provision in Russia (BOFIT Discussion Papers No 16). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p....
 
19.
Hale, Henry E. 2003. Explaining Machine Politics in Russia’s Regions: Economy, Ethnicity, and Legacy, “Post-Soviet Affairs”, 19(3): 228–263.
 
20.
Healey, Nigel M., Vladimir Leksin and Aleksandr Svetsov. 1999. The Municipalization of Enterprise-Owned ‘Social Assets’ in Russia, “Post-Soviet Affairs”, 15(3): 262–280.
 
21.
Hutcheson, Derek S. 2004. Protest and Disengagement in the Russian Federal Elections of 2003–04, “Perspectives on European Politics and Society”, 5(2): 305–330.
 
22.
Jensen, Jason L., Paul E. Sum and David T. Flynn. 2009. Political Orientations and Behavior of Public Employees: A Cross-National Comparison, “Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory”, 19: 709–730.
 
23.
Juurikkala, Tuuli and Olga Lazareva. 2012. Non-Wage Benefits, Costs of Turnover and Labour Attachment. Evidence from Russian Firms, “Economics of Transition”, 20(1): 113–136.
 
24.
Kalinin, Kirill and Walter R. Mebane. 2012. Understanding Electoral Frauds through Evolution of Russian Federalism: The Emergence of ‘Signaling Loyalty’, Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/pa....
 
25.
Kobak, Dmitry, Sergey Shpilkin and Maxim S. Pshenichnikov. 2012. Statistical Anomalies in 2011–2012 Russian Elections Revealed by 2D Correlation Analysis, Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.0741 1668154.
 
26.
Lankina, Tomila. 2002. Local Self-Government and Titular Regime Control in Russia’s Republics, 1991–1999 (Carl Beck papers in Russian and East European studies No. 1602). Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/45383....
 
27.
Leppänen, Simo, Mikael Linden and Laura Solanko. 2012. Firms, Public Good Provision and Institutional Uncertainty: Evidence from Russia, “Economic Systems”, 36: 522–530.
 
28.
McAllister, Ian and Stephen White. 2008. Voting ‘Against All’ in Postcommunist Russia, “Europe-Asia Studies”, 60(1): 67–87.
 
29.
McMann, Kelly M. 2006. Economic Autonomy and Democracy. Hybrid Regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
 
30.
Nichter, Simeon. 2008. Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot, “American Political Science Review”, 102(1): 19–31.
 
31.
Oreshkin, Dmitrii and Darya Oreshkina. 2006. Geografiya elektoral’noy kul’tury Rossii [The geography of Russia’s electoral culture], “Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’”, 5: 20–34.
 
32.
Oswald, Ingrid and Viktor Voronkov. 2004. The ‘Public-Private’ Sphere in Soviet and Post-Soviet Society. Perception and Dynamics of ‘Public’ and ‘Private’ in Contemporary Russia, “European Societies”, 6(1): 97–117.
 
33.
Petrov, Nikolay and Aleksey Titkov. 2013. Reyting demokratichnosti regionov Moskovskogo Tsentra Karnegi: 10 let v stroyu [Rating the democracy of the regions by Moscow Carnegie Center: 10 years in service], Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Center.
 
34.
Popov, Vladimir. 2004. Fiscal Federalism in Russia: Rules versus Electoral Politics, “Comparative Economic Studies”, 46(4): 515–541.
 
35.
Radaev, Vadim. 2011. Where Does the Demand for Regulation Come from? The State’s Return to the Retail Trade in Russia (HSE Research Paper No. WP BRP 02/SOC/2011). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p....
 
36.
Radygin, Aleksandr, Yuriy Simachev and Revold Entov. 2015. Gosudarstvennaya kompaniya: sfera proyavleniya «provalov gosudarstva» ili «provalov rynka»? [The state-owned company: the sphere of manifestation of a ‘state failure’ or ‘market failure’?], “Voprosy ekonomiki”, 1: 45–79.
 
37.
Rochlitz, Michael. 2016. Political Loyalty vs Economic Performance: Evidence from Machine Politics in Russia’s Regions (HSE Working Paper No. WP BRP 34/PS/2016). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p....
 
38.
Rosenfeld, Bryn. 2015. Varieties of Middle Class Growth and Democratic Preference Formation. PhD Dissertation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
 
39.
Rosenfeld, Bryn. 2017. Reevaluating the Middle-Class Protest Paradigm: A Case-Control Study of Democratic Protest Coalitions in Russia, “American Political Science Review”, 111(4): 637–652.
 
40.
Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS-HSE) (2008), National Research University Higher School of Economics; ZAO Demoscope; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Institute of Sociology Russian Academy of Sciences, Retrieved from www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/rlms-hse, www.hse.ru/org/hse/rlms.
 
41.
Safronov, Sergey and Natalia Zubarevich. 2005. Respublika Tatarstan [The Republic of Tatarstan], in Natalia Zubarevich (ed.), Rossiya regionov: v kakom sotsial’nom prostranstve my zhivem? [Russia of regions: What social space do we live in?], Moscow: Pomatur, pp. 181–191. Retrieved from www.socpol.ru/publications/book.shtml.
 
42.
Saikkonen, Inga A.-L. 2017. Electoral Mobilization and Authoritarian Elections: Evidence from Post-Soviet Russia, “Government and Opposition”, 52(1): 51–74.
 
43.
Salagaev, Aleksandr, Sergey Sergeev and Ludmila Luchisheva. 2009. Sotsiokul’turnyy portret Respubliki Tatarstan [Sociocultural portrait of the Republic of Tatarstan], Kazan: Federal’noe agentstvo po obrazovaniyu, Kazanskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnologicheskiy universitet.
 
44.
Sharafutdinova, Gulnaz. 2013. Getting the ‘Dough’ and Saving the Machine: Lessons from Tatarstan, “Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization”, 21(4): 507–529.
 
45.
Silver, Brian, Barbara Anderson and Paul Abramson. 1986. Who Overreports Voting?, “The American Political Science Review”, 80(2): 613–624.
 
46.
Stokes, Susan C. 2005. Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina, “American Political Science Review”, 99(3): 315–325.
 
47.
Tompson, William. 2007. Back to the Future? Thoughts on the Political Economy of Expanding State Ownership in Russia, in Peeter Vahtra and Kari Liuhto (eds.), Changes in Economic Power and Strategic Government Policies in Russia, London: Routledge (submitted), Retrieved from http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/509/.
 
48.
White, Allison and Inga A.-L. Saikkonen. 2017. More than a Name? Variation in Electoral Mobilisation of Titular and Non-Titular Ethnic Minorities in Russian National Elections, “Ethnopolitics”, 16(5): 450–470.
 
49.
World Data on Education 2010/11, 7th Edition, Geneva: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, International Bureau of Education.
 
50.
Youngs, Richard. 2002. The European Union and the Promotion of Democracy: Europe’s Mediterranean and Asian Policies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
eISSN:2300-7109
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top