Strona główna
O czasopiśmie
Zespół redakcyjny
Oświadczenie dotyczące etyki publikacji i nadużyć
Bieżący numer
Dla autorów
Proces recenzji
Wytyczne edytorskie
Oświadczenie Autora pracy (do pobrania)
Dla recenzentów
Zasady recenzji
Formularz recenzji
CFP
CfP Rzeczywistość Wirtualna (VR) jako przestrzeń interdyscyplinarnych badań nad społecznymi wyzwaniami i perspektywami
CfP Zdrowie i dobrostan a nowe media i nowe technologie
Wszystkie numery
Kontakt
Shift in Balance: UK Perspective on Democratic Deficit Addressed by Participatory Turn and Gamification
1
University of Leicester Institute for Inclusivity in Higher Education (ULIIHE)., University of Leicester, United Kingdom
Data nadesłania: 10-10-2022
Data akceptacji: 18-11-2022
Data publikacji: 30-12-2022
Autor do korespondencji
Benjamin Duke
University of Leicester Institute for Inclusivity in Higher Education (ULIIHE), University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
University of Leicester Institute for Inclusivity in Higher Education (ULIIHE), University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
Studia Humanistyczne AGH 2022;21(4):61-75
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
This paper provides a conceptual theoretical review of participatory turn and gamification from a United Kingdom (UK) perspective. Democratic deficit is a perennial problem in urban-planning systems due to the number of causal factors. Participatory practices and gamification are two instruments that can be used to help alleviate low democratic responsiveness. The paper articulates how there are different ways of knowing and assessing community priorities and values – people need increased consciousness and self-confidence to participate. The UK case studies that are discussed have made a significant contribution by providing useful insights regarding the benefits and limitations of participatory practices and gamification. For example, ‘Participology’ and ‘Geogopoly’ have clear participatory gamification benefits even though they are unable to include decision-maker accountability or recreate real-life power relationships. This paper posits that the use of participatory practices and/or gamification as policy levers (specifically in UK urban-planning processes) will herald a shift in the balance of power.
REFERENCJE (47)
1.
Afrin, S., Chowdhury, F.H., Rahman, M.M. (2021). COVID-19 Pandemic: Rethinking Strategies for Resilient Urban Design, Perceptions, and Planning. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3, 668263. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2....
2.
Aichholzer, G., Rose, G. (2020). Experience with Different Tools in Different Types of e-participation. In: L. Hennen, I. van Kuelen, I. Korthagen, G. Aichholzer, R. Lindner, R. Ojvind Nelson (eds.), European E-Democracy in Practice (pp. 93–140). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
3.
Anderson, J., Raine, L. (2020). Many Tech Experts Say Digital Disruption Will Hurt Democracy. Washington DC, USA: Pew Research Centre. Retrieved from: https://www. pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2020/02/PI_2020.02.21_future-democracy_REPORT.pdf [16.04.2022].
4.
Anderson, J., Rainie, L., Vogels, E. (2021). Experts Say the ‘New Normal’ in 2025, Will be Far More Tech-Driven, Presenting More Big Challenges. Washington DC, USA: Pew Research Centre. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/in... [7.04.2022].
5.
Auf, H., Dagman, J., Renstrom, S., Chaplin, J. (2021). Gamification and Nudging Techniques for Improving User Engagement in Mental Health and Well-being Apps. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED2021), 16–20 August 2021, Gothenburg, Sweden (pp. 1647–1656). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.20....
6.
Bussu, S., Golan, Y., Hargreaves, A. (2022). Understanding developments in Participatory Governance. Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University. Retrieved from: https://www.mmu.ac.uk/sites/de... in%20participatory%20governance_Bussu%20et%20al-06-08-22_final.pdf [23.01.2023].
7.
Cavada, M. (2022). Evaluate Space after Covid-19: Smart City Strategies for Gamification. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10447318.2021.2012383.
8.
Chen, W., Cheshmehzangi, A., Mangi, E., Heath, T., Ye, C., Yang, L. (2022). An Analysis of Residents’ Social Profiles Influencing Their Participation in Community Micro-Regeneration Projects in China: A Case Study of Yongtai Community, Guangzhous. Land, 11, 6, 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11....
9.
Chen, D., Bucchiarone, A., Lv, Z. (2022). MeetDurian: Can Location-Based Games be Used to Improve COVID-19 Hygiene Habits? Games and Culture, 17, 5, 679–702. https://doi. org/10.1177/15554120211049578.
10.
Constantinescu, T.I., Devisch, O., Huybrechts, L. (2020). Participation, for Whom? The Potential for Gamified Participatory Artefacts in Uncovering Power Relations within Urban Renewal Projects. International Journal of Geo-Information, 9, 5, 319. https://doi. org/10.3390/ijgi9050319.
11.
Davidova, M., Sharma, S., McMeel, D., Loizides, F. (2022). Co-De | GT: The Gamification and Tokenisation of More-Than-Human Qualities and Values. Sustainability, 14, 7, 3787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1407....
12.
Drill, S., Rosenblatt, C., Cooper, C., Cavalier, D., Ballard, H. (2022). The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Restrictions on Participation in Community and Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7, 1, 23, 1–14. http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.46....
13.
Fox, N., Cambell-Arvai, V., Linquist, M., Van Berkel, D., Serrano-Vergel, R. (2022). Gamifying Decision Support Systems to Promote Inclusive and Engaged Urban Resilience Planning. Urban Planning, 7, 2. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7....
14.
Galeote, D.F., Rajanen, M., Rajanen, D., Legati, N-Z., Langley, D.J., Hamari, J. (2021). Gamification for climate change engagement: review of corpus and future agenda. Environmental Research: Letters, 16, 063004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9....
15.
Gastil, J., Broghammer, M. (2021). Linking Theories of Motivation, Game Mechanics and Public Deliberation to Design an Online System for Participatory Budgeting. Political Studies, 69, 1, 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0032... [22.04.2022].
16.
Lekić Glavan, O., Nikolić, N., Folić, B., Vitošević, B., Mitrović, A., Kosanović, S. (2022). COVID-19 and City Space: Impact and Perspectives. Sustainability, 14, 3, 1885. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14031885.
17.
Gomes, A., Agarwal, T., Al-Ragam, A., Alshalfan, S. (2022). Using games for inclusive research and policy design – The case of Kuwaitscapes. London School of Economics (LSE) Research Methods, 3 March 2022. Retrieved from: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impact... [12.04.2022].
18.
Hassan, L., Hamari, J. (2020). Gameful civic engagement: A review of the literature on gamification of e-participation. Government Information Quarterly, 37, 3, 101461. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101461.
19.
Hidalgo, E.S., Perello, J., Becker, J., Bonhoure, I., Legris, M., Cigarini, A. (2021). Participation and Co-creation in Citizen Science. In: K. Vohland, A. Land-Zandstra, L. Ceccaroni, R. Lemmens, J. Perello, M. Ponti, R. Samson, K. Wagenknecht (eds.), The Science of Citizen Science (pp. 199–218). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_11#DOI.
20.
Hovde, S., Smzy, A., Ostern, T.P. (2021). Towards Just Dance Research: An uMunthu Participatory and Performative Inquiry into Malawian-Norwegian Entanglements. In: T. Seppala, M. Sarantou, Miettenen, S. (eds.), Arts-Based Methods for Decolonising Participatory Research (pp. 59–80). New York, USA – Oxon, UK: Routledge. Retrieved from: https:// library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/987f2a7a-a27c-4e03-b275-063f2a08103f/9781000392531. pdf [13.03.2022].
21.
IfG (Institute for Government). (2022). Metro mayors. Retrieved from: https://www.instituteforgovern... [21.12.2022].
22.
Krath, J., Schurmann, L., von Korflesch, H.F.O. (2021). Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and games-based learning. Computers in Human Behaviour, 125, 106963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
23.
Lawson, V., Purohit, R., Samuel, F., Brennan, J., Farrelly, L., Golden, S., McVicar, M. (UK Collaborative Centre for Housing Evidence (UKCCHE) and Community Consultation for Quality of Life (CCQOL) (2022). Public participation in planning in the UK: A review of the literature, 29 April 2022, London – Glasgow, UK: UKCCHE and CCQOL. Retrieved from: https://housingevidence.ac.uk/...- Public-participation-in-planning-in-the-UK_v3.pdf [8.05.2022].
24.
Lu, H., Ho, H. (2020). Exploring the Impact of Gamification on Users’ Engagement for Sustainable Development: A Case Study in Brand Applications. Sustainability, 12, 10, 4169. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1210....
25.
Mamede, A., Noordzij, G., Jongerling, J., Snijders, M., Schop-Etman, A., Denktas, S. (2021). Combining Web-Based Gamification and Physical Nudges With an App (MoveMore) to Promote Walking Breaks and Reduce Sedentary Behaviour of Office Workers: Field Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23, 4, e19875. https://doi.org/10.2196%2F1987....
26.
Mazarakis, A., Bräuer, P. (2023). Gamification is Working, but Which One Exactly? Results from an Experiment with Four Game Design Elements. International Journal of HumanComputer Interaction, 39, 3, 612–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/104473....
27.
Mosquera, J., Pagano, G. (2021). Gamification and New Scenarios for Digital Participation: Tools and Methods. Retrieved from: Cooperative City Magazine, https://cooperativecity.org/20... [7.03.2022].
28.
Muehlhaus, S.L., Eghtebas, C., Seifert, N., Shubert, G., Petzold, F., Klinker, G. (2022). Game. UP: Gamified Urban Planning Participation Enhancing Exploration, Motivation, and Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39, 1, 1–17. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.2012379.
29.
Nadi-Ravandi, S., Batooli, Z. (2022). Gamification in education: A scientometric and content and co-occurrence analysis of systematic review and meta-analysis articles. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 10207–10238. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639....
30.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2020a). Regionalisation in the context of decentralisation reforms. In: OECD, Decentralisation and Regionalisation in Portugal: What Reform Scenarios? (pp. 41–64). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/fea621....
31.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2020b). Cities Policy Responses. OECD Briefing Note. Updated 23 July 2020. Retrieved from: https://www. oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/cities-policy-responses-fd1053ff/ [5.07.2022].
32.
Palese, M. (2022). Democracy Made in England: Where Next for English Local Government. London, UK: Electoral Reform Society. Retrieved from: https://www.electoral-reform. org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Democracy-Made-in-England.pdf [10.07.2022].
33.
Pavlopoulou, Y. (2021). Methodologies of stakeholders’ engagement in circular collaborative ecosystems: Deliverable 3.2. Leuven, Belgium: Pop-Machina project 821479 – H2020. Retrieved from: https://pop-machina.eu/project... [5.07.2022].
34.
Puttkamer, L. (2020). Gamification in Urban Planning: Participation Through Minecraft. Retrieved from: https://www.urbanet.info/gamif... [14.04.2022].
35.
Regan, A., Quinn, M., Romaniuk, A., Sampson, S., Stratton, T. (2021). Devolution and Governance Structures in the UK: Lessons from Evidence. London: Industrial Strategy Council. Retrieved from: https://industrialstrategycoun... from%20evidence_Final%20Version270521.pdf [21.12.2022].
36.
Robinson, G.M., Hardman, M., Matey, R.J. (2021). Using games in geographical and planning-related teaching: Serious games, edutainment, board games and role play. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 4, 1, 100208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssah... [3.07.2022].
37.
Robinson-Yu, S. (2021). Gamification in Community Forums: Increase User Engagement. Retrieved from: https://blog.vanillaforums.com... [4.07.2022].
38.
Rodriguez, N.M., Martinez, R.G., Ziolkowski, R., Toliver, C., Young, H., Ruiz, Y. (2022). “COVID knocked me straight into the dirt”: perspective from people experiencing homelessness, on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health, 22, 1327. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889....
39.
Romano, M., Diaz, P., Aedo, I. (2022). Gamification-less: may gamification really foster civic participation? A controlled field experiment. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computer, 13, 4451–4465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652....
40.
Sailer, M., Hence, J.U., Mayr, S.K., Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological needs satisfaction. Computers in Human Behaviour, 69, 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb. 2016.12.033.
41.
Sandford, M. (2022). Local Government in England: structures. House of Commons Library, Summary Note 07104, 18 June 2022. Retrieved from: https://researchbriefings.file... [3.07.2022].
42.
Tewdwr-Jones, M., Wilson, A.. (2022). Co-Designing Urban Planning and Innovation Using LEGO® to Facilitate Collaboration, Participation and Ideas. Urban Planning, 7, 2, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7....
43.
Tseng, Y. (2022). Rethinking gamified democracy as frictional: a comparative examination of the Decide Madrid and vTaiwan platforms. Social & Cultural Geography, 1–18. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2022.2055779.
44.
Tzortzi, J.N., Guatia, L., Kouzoupi, A. (2022). Sustainable Strategies for Urban and Landscape Regeneration Related to Agri-Cultural Heritage in the Urban-Periphery of South Milan. Sustainability, 14, 11, 6581. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1411....
45.
Vaughn, L., Jacquez, F. (2020). Participatory Research Methods – Choice Points in the Research Process. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 1, 1, 1–14. https://doi. org/10.35844/001c.13244.
46.
Velenturf, A.P.M., Purnell, P. (2021). Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1437–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.....
47.
Zan, L. (2021). UNCHARTED Project: D3.1 Report on WP3 case study (selection), 24 December 2021. Bologna, Italy: University of Bologna. Retrieved from: https://uncharted-culture.eu/w... [9.03.2022].
| eISSN: | 2300-7109 |
Przetwarzamy dane osobowe zbierane podczas odwiedzania serwisu. Realizacja funkcji pozyskiwania informacji o użytkownikach i ich zachowaniu odbywa się poprzez dobrowolnie wprowadzone w formularzach informacje oraz zapisywanie w urządzeniach końcowych plików cookies (tzw. ciasteczka). Dane, w tym pliki cookies, wykorzystywane są w celu realizacji usług, zapewnienia wygodnego korzystania ze strony oraz w celu monitorowania ruchu zgodnie z Polityką prywatności. Dane są także zbierane i przetwarzane przez narzędzie Google Analytics (więcej).
Możesz zmienić ustawienia cookies w swojej przeglądarce. Ograniczenie stosowania plików cookies w konfiguracji przeglądarki może wpłynąć na niektóre funkcjonalności dostępne na stronie.
Możesz zmienić ustawienia cookies w swojej przeglądarce. Ograniczenie stosowania plików cookies w konfiguracji przeglądarki może wpłynąć na niektóre funkcjonalności dostępne na stronie.
